360° Coverage : The High-Flying Debtor Gets His Wings Clipped In Newcomer

10 Updates

The High-Flying Debtor Gets His Wings Clipped In Newcomer

Dec 28 2013, 6:59pm CST | by

Before Michael and Megan Newcomer were married, they entered into a prenuptial agreement that excluded from a divorce division the gifts and inheritances they received, plus any growth or...

Filed under: news

 
 
 

30 weeks ago

The High-Flying Debtor Gets His Wings Clipped In Newcomer

Dec 28 2013, 6:59pm CST | by

Before Michael and Megan Newcomer were married, they entered into a prenuptial agreement that excluded from a divorce division the gifts and inheritances they received, plus any growth or appreciation in any business caused by their separate personal efforts.

The best man at their wedding was Greg Kiley, Michael’s college buddy. Some years later, Kiley moved in with Michael and Megan, while Kiley and Michael worked to create a new phone company called “Velocity – The Greatest Phone Company Ever, Inc.”

By this time, Michael and Megan had four children, and had quit her career to take care of these kids.

Within a year after Velocity taking off, Michael and Megan divorced. Megan got custody of the kids, and Michael was ordered to pay a little over $1,000 per month in child support, and $3,500 in spousal support, plus sundry other expenses and payments.

But Michael did not pay as ordered, and Megan dragged him back into Court. Although Michael held himself out as the President and CEO of Velocity, he disclaimed any ownership interest in the company. Moreover:

[Michael] had banking authority for Velocity and used his personal accounts as a conduit to transfer millions of dollars to other individuals or corporations. [Michael] was also the recipient of certain “loans” from Velocity.

Megan also complained that while Michael refused to pay his lawful obligations, Michael lived in a $600,000 house and drove a Mercedes that was paid by Velocity.

For his part, Michael claimed that he had no reportable income, but instead lived on gifts from Megan’s parents (who had paid the couple’s mortgage to prevent foreclosure) and Kiley. The trial court found this claim “not credible”.

After 11 days of hearings, the trial court found that:

between 2006 and 2010, [Michael] obtained hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of “loans” from Velocity, drove luxury vehicles, took extravagant vacations and lived in an expensive home. The court noted that the lavishness of [Michael]‘s lifestyle did not subside even after he was supposedly “fired” from Velocity. The court found [Michael] voluntarily unemployed and, based on the lifestyle he provided his family before institution of the divorce and the lifestyle he provided himself during the pendency of the action, imputed to him an annual income of $150,000.

The trial court thus awarded the family home to Megan, with some offsets to Michael, and ordered Michael to pay his $146,983 in unpaid obligations to Megan. While neither allowing discovery nor evidence as to the ownership of Velocity, the company still factored into the trial court’s decision:

With respect to Velocity, the trial court characterized the company as a “quagmire of bank accounts, undocumented loans, unaccountable pay-outs and wire transfers of millions of dollars to and through personal accounts * * * and blatant commingling of corporate and personal funds.”

Both Michael and Megan appealed.

Michael first appealed the awarding of support to Megan, which their prenuptial agreement prohibited. Megan countered that the circumstances had changed so much between their 1992 marriage and their 2007 divorce that the prenuptial agreement no longer should be effective.

On this point, Michael lost and Megan won, the trial court having found that to sustain the prenuptial agreement would be “unfair and inequitable” because of their changed circumstances; namely, Megan giving up her career to take care of their children.

Michael’s next argument was that Megan had received gifts from her wealthy parents, and these gifts to Megan obviated her need for Michael’s income; plus, Megan stood someday to receive a huge inheritance. But this argument was rejected as well:
/>

The trial court properly included the income from [Megan]‘s trust in computing the relative earning power of the parties. [Megan]‘s parents have no legal obligation to provide gifts or support for their daughter irrespective of their ability to do so. Any inheritance is but an expectation. The gifts and loans [Michael] received from [Megan]‘s parents during the pendency of the divorce substituted for money [Michael] was legally obligated to pay and did not. This prevented a threatened foreclosure of the family home. In fairness, such generosity should not now weigh to relieve [Michael] of some, or all, of his obligation to [Megan].

That brings us to the issue of “Imputed Income”, i.e., how much money was Michael really receiving — or should have been receiving by whatever name?

Here, the Family Law Courts have great latitude to look at a bunch of factors to determine how much money somebody should be making, such as their education, experience, employment opportunities, local salary averages, etc.

The trial court too all these factors into consideration and determined that Michael should be making at least $150,000 per year. But what really hurt Michael was that his relationship with Velocity wasn’t clear. He was taking loans against future commissions, but neither he nor Kiley could make clear to the trial court how all that worked.

Although Michael had taken loans up to $2.8 million at one time from Velocity, much of which Velocity had since written off, it was just too much for Michael to then claim that he had no reportable income between 2006 and 2009 — relying instead on Kiley’s gifts. Thus:

The trial court found [Michael]‘s true income to be “elusive.” This elusiveness was due in no small measure to the irregular business practices and lack of fiscal accountability of Velocity. Millions of dollars passed annually from Velocity through [Michael]‘s personal bank accounts. This money was then wire transferred to other individuals or related companies. Both [Michael] and Kiley regularly used Velocity accounts and credit cards for personal purposes. [Michael] and Kiley converted Velocity checks into cash at a vaguely affiliated check cashing store. Velocity paid for luxury car leases and travel for both men. During the time [Michael] claims zero reportable income, he reported monthly expenses of $7,800.

In September, 2010, when Kiley and [Michael] testified that Kiley fired [Michael] from a job [Michael] earlier denied having, there was little change in the relationship between the two men and [Michael] appears to have continued a lavish lifestyle. He continued to travel. He bought a motorcycle and put it in a girlfriend’s name. He assisted another girlfriend in opening a teen nightclub and claimed he took no share in the club’s $9,600 or more weekly cash grosses.

At the time [Michael] claimed to be unemployed and without income, he shared a home with the second girlfriend, paying $1,400 per month rent, driving a Range Rover and a Suzuki motorcycle, traveling frequently to Las Vegas, Miami, and Chicago. The second girlfriend testified at trial that she also received many gifts of jewelry and clothing from [Michael] during this period. The girlfriend testified that during 2009 neither she nor [Michael] worked and explained their lifestyle as the result of the generosity of Kiley and Velocity. The trial court found this testimony “not credible.”

The bottom line in the Court’s was that Michael was “voluntarily unemployed” and living off Velocity through Kiley. While this seems to be an easy conclusion under the circumstances, it was still tough for the Court to determine what Michael should have been earning from Velocity so as to impute a specific amount of income to him. But, considering all the facts, $150,000 per year seemed reasonable (if not somewhat low).

The trial court gave Michael 30 days to pay up, or spend 30 days in jail. The Court of Appeals affirmed, but did give Michael a $6,000 credit for a miscalculation by the trial court as to the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy.

Megan also appealed. Her argument was that the Internal Affairs Doctrine should not have been applied in this case to apply Delaware law to a dispute in Ohio, even if it involved a Delaware corporation. The trial court’s application of Delaware law kept Megan from getting crucial discovery on Velocity. As stated by the Court of Appeals:

The doctrine of internal affairs is a conflict of laws principle which recognizes the policy that a state should have authority to regulate the internal affairs of its own corporations. 

Curiously, Megan didn’t point out that the Internal Affairs Doctrine does not apply to external creditors, which even Delaware’s law has long recognized. Instead, Megan argued that the Internal Affairs Doctrine was outdated; an argument that predictably fell on deaf ears.

Next, Megan complained that the trial court should have awarded her an amount certain in Velocity, instead of just half of Michael’s interest — whatever that was or wasn’t. The problem was that establishing what interest, if at all, Michael had in Velocity would have required Megan to file a lawsuit in Delaware, where the company was formed.

Similarly, the Court of Appeals shot down Megan’s request that a Receiver be appointed for Velocity, as that is a very drastic remedy and at best Megan was simply entitled to half of whatever Michael had, if anything.

Megan also argued that because of Michael’s financial misconduct, she should get a larger award of the marital property. The problem was that the trial court did not make a specific finding of financial misconduct by Michael, and the Court of Appeals was not willing to make one itself. The Court of Appeals probably should have remanded the issue back to the trial court, but for whatever reason did not decide to do so.

Similarly, the Court of Appeals was not willing to award Megan her attorney’s fees and litigation costs. By this point in the Opinion, one certain gets the flavor that the Court of Appeals was saying “A pox on both of your houses”. The Court didn’t have any sympathy for Michael, but didn’t have much for Megan either./>/>

ANALYSIS

The most important thing we get out of this Opinion is the example of imputed income.

Many asset protection plans are defective because they provide no method — or a poor method — of getting income to the debtor while the debtor is working through creditor issues. Merely running money through a buddy or significant other will not always fly under the radar, as here. To the contrary, the more cute somebody tries to play this, the less likely a judge is to buy it.

Probably the best way to get a debtor money is to have some entity pay the money out in the open as income. Federal law, more specifically 15 U.S.C. sec. 1673(a) restricts a wage garnishment to 25% of “disposable earnings” (read: net after tax and FICA withholding). While the creditor will get a little money, the debtor will have an explainable source of income.

Otherwise, courts have great latitude in judgment enforcement proceedings to impute income to debtors. Gifts, loans and other types of value transferred to the debtor (or made available for the debtor’s use, such as credit cards) can all be determined to be imputed income by the court. But if these income streams are not wages, then the creditor may be entitled to their full value.

Notably, both the payor and the debtor/payee can be bound by the courts order, so that if the debtor receives something of value when it was supposed to go to a creditor instead, the debtor/payee can be held in contempt of court (as here) while the payee can be subject to a creditor’s suit for damages.

But this Opinion has a second lesson — an important corollary of “If you’ve got it, flaunt it.” That lesson is: “If you’re claiming not to have it, then don’t flaunt it.” Here, Michael lived well beyond that of his claim of being flat busted broke. As a consequence, both the trial court and Court of Appeals were quite willing to determine that he had other sources of income by whatever name.

Sometimes, asset protection clients get the idea in their heads that they can continue to live their ordinary lifestyle while creditors hover about. Sometimes they can, if their creditors are not aggressive. But if they have aggressive creditors, those creditors will use the debtor’s lifestyle against him or her whenever possible and utterly wreck the debtor’s credibility with the court.

To the contrary, debtors must lay low and act with austerity when they have creditor problems. If you are going to claim in open court that you are broke, you’d sure better act broke. Yet, many asset protection planners tell their clients that they can go through financial trauma without even temporarily changing their lifestyles — in the vast majority of cases that is just not true.

CITE AS

Newcomer v. Newcomer, 2013 WL 6795622 (Ohio.App., Dec. 20, 2013). http://goo.gl/DTq3Tb

This article at http://onforb.es/Kcplnc and http://goo.gl/8WT7P0

Source: Forbes Business

 
Update
10

7 weeks ago

RM47mil KWSG contributions still unclaimed

Jun 9 2014 7:54am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR: About RM47 million of contributions in the Teachers Provident Fund (KWSG) still remain unclaimed, the Dewan Rakyat was told to ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
9

7 weeks ago

Gold shop lost almost RM1mil

Jun 9 2014 3:50am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

KANGAR: A gold shop owner lost almost RM1 million after after the safe on in his shop was broken into ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
8

7 weeks ago

Motion to debate MAS losses in Dewan Rakyat rejected

Jun 9 2014 3:39am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR: AN emergency motion to debate the losses incurred by Malaysia Airlines last year, amounting to RM1.2 billion was reje ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
7

7 weeks ago

MH370 Tragedy: Hisham: RM27.6 mil spent on 1st phase of SAR

Jun 9 2014 2:11am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia spent some RM27.6 million in its first phase of the search operations for missing Malaysia Airline flight MH370, said Acting Transport Mini ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
6

7 weeks ago

9.1m litres of diesel seized in a month

Jun 8 2014 1:11am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

PUTRAJAYA: The Domestic Trade, Cooperatives, and Consumerism ministry has seized some 9.1 million litres of diesel and property worth RM58 million since mounting ‘Operasi Diesel Selatan’ in the southern st ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
5

7 weeks ago

Girl, 9, awarded RM2.78m compensation for medical negligence

Jun 6 2014 4:56am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR: A nine-year-old girl who suffered brain damage during her birth at a government hospital was awarded over RM2.78 mil ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
4

7 weeks ago

Malaysia's total trade in April up 12pc

Jun 5 2014 11:52pm CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's total trade in April 2014 rose by 12 per cent from a year ago to RM123.86 billion due to growing trading activities, International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Mustapa ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
3

8 weeks ago

Works Ministry to spend RM20m for upgrading works at 50 accident black spots

Jun 4 2014 11:35pm CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

JOHOR BARU: The Works Ministry will implement upgrading works at 50 accident prone locations in the country that have been identified this year involving an allocation of RM20 millio ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
2

8 weeks ago

Najib launches loan scheme for Ramadan traders

Jun 4 2014 10:24pm CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

PUTRAJAYA: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak today launches RM45 million Ramadan Bazaar S ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 
Update
1

8 weeks ago

Residents bring up objection against Kidex to Suhakam

Jun 4 2014 4:49am CDT | Source: Business Times Malaysia

PETALING JAYA: A group of 20 Petaling Jaya residents held a meeting with the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) over their objection against the proposed RM2.2 billion Kinr ...
Source: Business Times Malaysia   Full article at: Business Times Malaysia
 

 

Don't miss ...

 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/30" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Now SEPA to facilitate euro payments
Brussels, Aug 1 (IANS) The European Commission said Thursday that the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) would become fully operational in all euro zone countries from Aug 1, 2014 onwards.
 
 
Ebola outbreak: $100 mn response plan in West Africa
Geneva, Aug 1 (IANS) The director-general of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and presidents of West African countries hit by the Ebola virus outbreak will Friday meet in Guinea to launch a new $100 million response plan.
 
 
OPEC daily basket price closes lower
Vienna, July 31 (IANS) The basket of 12 crude oils of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) stood at $105.21 a barrel Wednesday, against $105.44 Tuesday, according to the OPEC Secretariat.
 
 
Ebola outbreak not a global threat: Report
London, July 31 (IANS) The deadly Ebola virus does not pose a global threat, a latest report has claimed, adding that as long as the virus continues to infect people in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, there is small risk of more long-distance export of the disease.
 
 
 

Latest from the Network

Kelsey Grammer wants more kids
Los Angeles, Aug 1 (IANS) Actor Kelsey Grammer, who recently became father for the sixth time and is also a grandfather, is keen to expand his family even at the age of 69. His young wife Kayte gave birth to the...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Eddie Cibrian has no 'ulterior motives'
Eddie Cibrian believes his new reality TV show will prove he is devoted to LeAnn Rimes. The 41-year-old actor, who tied the knot with the country singer in 2011 after their affair led to the breakdown of their first...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Chad Kroeger buys 17-carat ring for Avril Lavigne
Chad Kroeger bought Avril Lavigne a lavish 17-carat diamond ring for their first wedding anniversary. The 'Here's to Never Growing Up' hitmaker, who married the Nickelback frontman, 39, at Château de La Napoule in the...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Hilary Duff's separation has been 'very difficult'
Hilary Duff admits her split from husband Mike Comrie has been ''very difficult.'' The 'Chasing the Sun' hitmaker, who announced her separation from the former ice hockey player in January after three years of marriage...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
China accuses US over military reconnaissance
Beijing, Aug 1 (IANS) China Thursday accused the US of regular reconnaissance by naval ships and aircraft in Chinese waters and airspace. "Vessels and aircraft of the US military have for a long time carried out...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
UAE provides $544 mn for needy West Bank families
Dubai, Aug 1 (IANS) The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has provided two million Dirham (544 million dollars) in aid to more than 4,400 needy families in the West Bank during holy month of Ramadan. The aid was provided...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Iggy Azalea to make film debut in 'Fast and Furious 7'
Los Angeles, Aug 1 (IANS) Singer-model Iggy Azalea is all set to make her acting debut. She will be seen in a cameo in the forthcoming movie "Fast and Furious 7", actor Vin Diesel has revealed. The 47 year-old actor...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Kelly Osbourne sued by former landlord
Los Angeles, Aug 1 (IANS) Kelly Osbourne's former landlord has sued her by claimed that the singer caused damages worth $70,000 to his property after she let her dogs defecate all over the apartment. The "Fashion...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Lana Del Rey says ex-boyfriend is 'unwell'
Lana Del Rey claims her ex-boyfriend Barrie-James O'Neill is ''unwell.'' The 'Summertime Sadness' hitmaker, who split from the Scottish musician in June after three years together, admits they were not a good match, as...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Ryan Seacrest's pals concerned about his gilfriend
Ryan Seacrest's friends are allegedly worried his girlfriend might be a ''gold digger.'' The 'American Idol' host, 39, started dating 24-year-old fitness trainer Shayna Taylor last summer, but his close pals reportedly...
Read more on Celebrity Balla