Argentina May Get Supreme Court Review For Its First Debt Case, But Not The Second

Jan 6 2014, 12:59pm CST | by

Argentina May Get Supreme Court Review For Its First Debt Case, But Not The Second
Photo Credit: Forbes Business

Originally posted at WLF’s Legal Pulse blog

On the day that it returns from its holiday break on January 10, the chances are good that the U.S. Supreme Court will agree to review a dispute between Argentina and a creditor that is owed substantial sums on defaulted bondsRepublic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd ., Case No. 12-842.  That dispute is not the one that has been making big headlines for the past year, however.  The high-profile case—in which the federal appeals court in New York (the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit) last August upheld an order barring Argentina from treating “holdout” bondholders such as NML less favorably than other bondholders—has not yet reached the Supreme Court.  Moreover, major differences exist between the two cases such that even if the Court decides this week to review the first case, there is no reason to view that decision as an indication that the Court is likely to grant review in the second, higher profile case.  Indeed, there is good reason to conclude that the Court will not agree to hear the second case, which would preserve the bondholder’s victory.

The petition for review that the High Court will consider on January 10 arises from NML’s efforts to collect on court judgments against Argentina totaling $1.6 billion.  NML obtained the judgments after Argentina defaulted on bonds held by NML, which the nation has refused to voluntarily pay.  When judgment creditors are faced with a recalcitrant debtor, the law permits them to subpoena records for the purpose of attempting to pinpoint the location of the debtor’s assets; if they locate “nonexempt” assets, they are entitled to seize the assets in satisfaction of their court judgments.  NML has been attempting to engage in just such document discovery.  In particular, in 2010 it served document subpoenas on two banks located in New York in an effort to learn more about how Argentina moves assets through New York and around the world.  Over Argentina’s objection, the lower federal courts upheld the subpoenas.  Early in 2013, Argentina filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to review those decisions; Argentina asserted that the subpoenas violated its rights under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).

Although the Supreme Court grants no more than a tiny fraction of the thousands of petitions for review it receives each year, there is reason to conclude that the Court is giving serious consideration to granting Argentina’s petition.  First, the Court issued an order last April directing the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States about the case.  The Court issues no more than a handful of such orders each year; an order directing the Solicitor General to file a brief is generally viewed as an indication that the Court is actively mulling the petition in question.  The Solicitor General’s brief, filed earlier this month, recommended that the Court grant Argentina’s petition.  As studies have shown, such a recommendation substantially increases the chances of the Court’s granting a petition.

Nonetheless, a certiorari grant in the pending Argentina petition should not be viewed as a signal that the Court will also grant the yet-to-be-filed “pari passu” petition from the Second Circuit decision.  Argentina argues in both cases that the lower court orders violated the FSIA, but the similarity between the two cases ends there.  In particular, the reasons why the Court may be leaning in the direction of granting Argentina’s pending petition are largely inapplicable to the impending second petition.

The principal factor supporting Supreme Court review is the resolution of conflicting interpretations of law by two or more federal appeals courts.  In the case pending before the High Court, the Second Circuit has adopted an interpretation of the FSIA that directly conflicts with an interpretation of the FSIA adopted by the Seventh Circuit.  A 2011 Seventh Circuit decision held that the FSIA severely limits the scope of post-judgment discovery directed at a foreign sovereign’s assets.  Noting that the FSIA permits attachment of only a very limited category of assets belonging to a foreign sovereign, the Seventh Circuit held that any post-judgment discovery must be limited to assets that are both located within the United States and subject to attachment under the FSIA.  In contrast, the Second Circuit has held for many years that the FSIA imposes no such limitations on discovery.  In particular, it held in this case that the FSIA did not bar NML from engaging in discovery from non-party banks regarding Argentine assets located throughout the world.  While recognizing that U.S. courts cannot order attachment of Argentine assets located outside the U.S., the Second Circuit held that NML could use information gleaned from its document discovery to ask foreign courts to attach those assets.  Given that two federal appeals courts have adopted directly conflicting interpretations of the FSIA as applied to document discovery, it would not be surprising if the Court—in accord with the recommendation of the Solicitor General—grants the pending certiorari petition.

In contrast, the pari passu case does not involve any FSIA issue over which the federal appeals courts disagree.  Argentina argues that district court injunctions—which bar Argentina from making payments to holders of 2005 Exchange Bonds unless it makes equivalent payments to holdout bondholders—violate the FSIA because they amount to an attachment of Argentina’s assets.  The Second Circuit brushed that argument aside in its August 2013 decision upholding the district court injunctions, explaining, “The injunctions allow Argentina to pay its [bond] debts with whatever resources it likes.”  Importantly, no other federal appeals court has issued a conflicting interpretation of what constitutes an “attachment” for purposes of the FSIA.  There is little reason to believe that the Supreme Court will agree to review the Second Circuit’s pari passu decision in the absence of such a conflict.

Moreover, the FSIA provision that caused the Solicitor General to question the Second Circuit’s document discovery decision is not applicable to the pari passu case.  The Solicitor General asserted that because a FSIA provision bars attachment of foreign sovereign assets located outside the U.S., that provision should also be interpreted as barring discovery regarding non-U.S. assets—because such discovery could only be seen as a precursor to an effort to attach assets over which U.S. courts lack any jurisdiction.  The Solicitor General’s assertion has no relevance to the pari passu case; the sole purpose of the injunctions issued in that case is to assure that holdout bondholders like NML receive “equal treatment,” not to permit the later attachment of any Argentine assets.

Argentina is scheduled to file its Supreme Court certiorari petition in the pari passu case sometime between February and April 2014.  The probability that the Court will agree to hear the case is extremely low given the absence of any decisions that conflict with the Second Circuit’s interpretation of the FSIA provisions at issue in that case.  That probability is reduced further still by Argentina’s repeated statements that it will not comply with an adverse decision; the Supreme Court is highly unlikely to devote its limited resources to hearing a petition from a party that does not consent to be bound by the Court’s decision on the merits.  For all the reasons outlined above, a decision by the Court this month to grant review in Argentina’s document discovery dispute should not be interpreted as a signal that the Court is likely to grant review in the pari passu case as well.

Source: Forbes Business

 
 

Don't miss ...

 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/30" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Bhopal fugitive Warren Anderson is dead (Roundup, Changing dateline)
Washington, Oct 31 (IANS) Warren Anderson, the former CEO of Union Carbide Corp, has died at 92 after living for 30 years under the shadow of the 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy that killed thousands.
 
 
Sit-ins delayed building powerhouses: Nawaz Sharif
Islamabad, Oct 31 (IANS) Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif Friday blamed sit-ins for delaying the construction of powerhouses in the country, as cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan continued protesting with supporters in the capital city for over two months.
 
 
Britain to repay part of First World War debt
London, Oct 31 (IANS) British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne Friday announced that the British government will pay off part of the country's First World War debt as part of the redemption of bonds stretching as far back as the 18th century.
 
 
UN-Habitat presents the first World Cities Day
Shanghai, Oct 31 (IANS/EFE) The UN Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), headed by former Barcelona mayor Joan Clos, Friday launched its first World Cities Day in China, to be held every Oct 31 to promote sustainable development.
 
 
 

Latest from the Network

Apple Outsmarts Samsung in Terms of Revenue Generation
Samsung can sell more products, but it doesn’t mean that it will earn more profit, as Apple overtakes the Korean giant with respect to the earnings.According to the Cult of Mac, Samsung earned a profit of $3.8 billion...
Read more on Apple Balla
 
Apple Declares Not to Remove PCalc iOS Calculator Widget
The PCalc iOs calculator widget is free from the risk of being removed, as Apple decides not to drop it from the App Store.According to Tech Crunch, the officials of Apple have confirmed about the move, stating that it...
Read more on Apple Balla
 
Seth Rogen to Act as Steve Wozniak in the Steve Jobs’ Movie
Seth Rogen has got an important role in the biopic of the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, as he has been selected to play as Steve Wozniak.According to the Variety, Rogen will be advised directly by Steve Wozniak, the...
Read more on Apple Balla
 
Ponzy schemer cheats residents of $22 mn, gets 15-year jail
Washington, Oct 31 (IANS) If you have been one of those approached by some 'known' person for investing in something with an assurance of 'easy money', you may benefit reading about this Ponzi schemer jailed in the US...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Burkina Faso's president quits, army chief takes power (Roundup)
Ouagadougou, Oct 31 (IANS) Burkina Faso's army chief Gen. Nabere Honore Traore assumed power Friday after President Blaise Compaore announced his resignation following violent protests against his attempt to extend...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Spanish government challenges Catalonia's symbolic vote on independence
Madrid, Oct 31 (IANS/EFE) Spain's government Friday challenged Catalonia's decision to hold a symbolic vote Nov 9 as an alternative to a referendum on independence stalled by the Constitutional Court. The government...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Myanmar roundtable summit discusses political issues
Nay Pyi Taw, Oct 31 (IANS) Myanmar's first five-party roundtable summit held in the Presidential Palace here Friday discussed some key political issues in the country, presidential spokesman U Ye Htut said at a press...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Jake Gyllenhaal saves outrageous clothes for Halloween
Jake Gyllenhaal always wears his ''sl***iest outfit'' every Halloween. The 33-year-old actor has revealed his dad, director Stephen Gyllenhaal, is ''obsessed'' with Halloween and throughout his childhood Jake and his...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Katie Holmes would tell her younger self to 'relax'
Katie Holmes would tell her younger self to ''relax''. The 35-year-old actress, who has eight-year-old daughter Suri with ex-husband Tom Cruise, claims she never believed she could carve out a career in Hollywood while...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Joshua Jackson calls Diane Kruger his wife
Joshua Jackson calls Diane Kruger his wife. The 'Affair' star, who previously admitted he and his German girlfriend of eight years are unlikely to ever marry, doesn't like referring to the blonde beauty as his...
Read more on Celebrity Balla