If The U.S. Trade Agenda Implodes, Blame The Equivocator-In-Chief

Feb 1 2014, 6:05pm CST | by


Did Harry Reid kill the trade agenda?  The Senate Majority Leader is no champion of economic freedom to be sure, but his opposition to the fast track bill doesn’t kill it.  It merely strengthens the hand of his colleagues who might support a more protectionist version of the legislation. It’s an invitation to negotiate./>

Those who may have thought a fast track bill could be plopped down and rammed through a skeptical Democratic caucus – especially with its only Democratic sponsor, Senator Max Baucus, not sticking around to see it through – failed to account for history or for the consequences of the president’s refusal to do anything to soften the ground for trade legislation in Washington. If the trade agenda implodes, blame President Obama and nobody else. His failure to invest in a straightforward narrative to reassure doubters and explain trade’s enormous benefits has yielded commensurate dividends.

While he has encouraged his trade negotiators’ to bring home big “21st Century” trade deals, which include rules that penetrate more deeply into what was once considered domestic policy space, the president has never attempted to assuage concerns, correct misconceptions, or make an affirmative public case for why trade (or these new rules) are essential to the nation’s prosperity. That has left a vacuum gladly filled by organized, anti-trade interests, who have spread rumors and preyed on the public’s worst fears.

During the past year, as domestic opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was metastasizing, the administration issued nary a peep in rebuttal to allegations of imminent job losses, erosion of labor and product safety standards, environmental catastrophe, loss of internet freedoms, inaccessibility to medicines, threats to the food supply chain and other aspects of public health, or the acquiescence of policy making to multinational corporations. That silence lent credibility to claims that were mostly absurd, inspiring more opposition. The White House seems never to have anticipated the need to engage in domestic dialogue or negotiations that would require the president to not only stand up to his traditional allies on the Left, but to stand with congressional Republicans.

So reluctant is President Obama to challenge Democratic Party dogma with the specifics of his trade agenda that he decided, instead, to kick that can down the road for three years, as his negotiators went full steam ahead on TPP and launched the transatlantic talks without adequate knowledge of the trade negotiating objectives and parameters Congress would demand in exchange for the fast track consideration of those deals he now seeks. Despite the administration’s assurances that Congress was being kept in the loop about the TPP every step of the way, the idea of retrofitting the fast track language to the terms of TPP, instead of the other way around, was always presumptuous and risky, and that approach has rubbed some legislators the wrong way.  Whatever political potholes the president sought to avoid by bypassing fast track authority at the outset have grown deeper and wider.

What explains this illogical tack?  Uncertainty? Timidity? Both, and perhaps a heavy does of ambivalence.

The president remains deeply conflicted on trade, beholden to incongruous beliefs. He acknowledges the imperative of U.S. global economic engagement, but seems also to believe that trade exacerbates income inequality and environmental degradation.  He likes the idea of boosting exports, but cannot manage to accept the fact that trade agreements also mean more import competition.  For those who fail to see trade as the mutually beneficial exchange between willing parties that it is but instead view it as a zero -sum game between “us” and “them,” imports are to be minimized – and their impact swept under the rug, if you’re a politician unwilling to take a stand.

As I elaborated in this column two months back:

Presumably, the president’s reluctance reflects the reality that his party in Congress largely opposes trade agreements. More than 150 of 200 House Democrats have registered their opposition to granting their president TPA [Trade Promotion Authority]. He knows how they feel. He was with them not too long ago, and part of him may still be. As has been the case for five years, the president remains unwilling to challenge his party’s orthodoxy or to pick a fight with congressional Democrats or the unions and environmental groups to whom they are beholden.

A president who says he will “work to enact bipartisan trade promotion authority to protect our workers and environment and to open markets to new goods stamped ‘Made in the U.S.A’,” is reinforcing the myths that sustain trade’s skeptics and hindering, not helping, the effort. Those words do not constitute leadership on trade. Those are the words of protectionists.

It is obvious that the president is uncomfortable making an affirmative, public pitch for the trade agenda his administration has pursued and, in some sense, wishes this whole trade liberalization thing would just go away. In that regard, by saying “no” and “not now,” Senator Reid has given the president license to continue to equivocate, as he waits to see where the winds blow in Congress on this. 
/>

If fast track is granted, the White House can spin whatever amendments were made to the original bill as sensible improvements sought by Democrats in keeping with the president’s promises to protect the interest of workers and the environment. If fast track is rejected or derailed until after the election, the White House can blame congressional Republicans and business for being too unwilling to compromise. 

But how the president ultimately spins it depends on which outcome he actually favors.  At this late stage, the jury’s still out.

Source: Forbes Business

 
 

Don't miss ...

 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/30" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Mali confirms two new Ebola cases
United Nations, Nov 26 (IANS) Mali has confirmed two new cases of Ebola, bringing to total number of cases in the West African nation to eight, days ahead of the opening of a new UN Ebola response office.
 
 
Merkel warns of recession in Europe
Berlin, Nov 26 (IANS) German Chancellor Angela Merkel Tuesday warned that Europe could slide back into recession, media reported.
 
 
India, Nepal ink nine deals; Modi inaugurates trauma centre, bus service (Roundup)
Kathmandu, Nov 25 (IANS) Nepal's happiness "gives us joy", Prime Minister Narendra Modi said here Tuesday on his second visit to the Himalayan country in 100 days as both sides inked nine agreements, further cementing their close ties.
 
 
India, Nepal ink 10 deals; Modi inaugurates trauma centre, bus service (Intro Roundup)
Kathmandu, Nov 25 (IANS) Nepal's happiness "gives us joy", Prime Minister Narendra Modi said here Tuesday on his second visit to the Himalayan country in 100 days as both sides inked 10 agreements, including on $1 billion assistance to Nepal.
 
 
 

Latest from the Network

US urges eradication of armed rebels in Congo
Washington, Nov 26 (IANS) The US Tuesday called for efforts to wipe out illegal armed groups in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as the number of civilians killed there has risen to some 200 in less than...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Eating healthy tough for Cumberbatch
Los Angeles, Nov 26 (IANS) Actor Benedict Cumberbatch says he struggles to eat health food. The "Sherlock" star says that despite trying his best to maintain his nutritious diet, he often struggles to keep it up while...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
24 killed in coal mine fire in China
Beijing, Nov 26 (IANS) At least 24 workers were killed and 52 others injured in coal mine fire in northeast China's Liaoning Province early Wednesday, the state-owned Liaoning Fuxin Coal Corporation said. The fire...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Jordin Sparks hits out at Jason Derulo
Jordin Sparks has taken a swipe at her ex-boyfriend Jason Derulo in a song. The 24-year-old beauty appears to take aim at her former lover, with whom she had a three-year relationship that ended in September, in her...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Eva Mendes reveals motherhood has brought 'wild nights'
Eva Mendes has had some of the ''wildest nights'' of her life since giving birth to her first child, Esmeralda Amada. The 40-year-old actress, who has been dating Ryan Gosling since 2011, gave birth six weeks ago and...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Cate Blanchett feels judged by other mothers
Cate Blanchett feels her parenting skills are being judged by other mothers. The Oscar-winning actress has three children - Dashielle, 12, Roman, 10 and Ignatuis, six - and says she's held to a different set of...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Jimmy Page reveals his admiration of Leona Lewis
Jimmy Page says performing with Leona Lewis was one of the highlights of his career. The Led Zepplin guitarist was asked to name the greatest moment of his professional life outside of the band and he cited performing...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
UN chief 'deeply concerned' over escalating violence in Libya
United Nations, Nov 26 (IANS) UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Tuesday said he was "deeply concerned" over the recent escalating violence in Libya, calling on all parties to "end these attacks and prevent further...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Kate Hudson's fitness secrets
Los Angeles, Nov 26 (IANS) If you desire to have an incredibly toned physique a la Kate Hudson, you've got to work your "a** off", says the actress. The 35-year-old, who is a mother of two, says that her svelte figure...
Read more on Celebrity Balla