360° Coverage : Obamacare: America's Greatest Legislation Since the Civil...

2 Updates

Obamacare: America's Greatest Legislation Since the Civil Rights Act?

Mar 4 2014, 1:37pm CST | by

Obamacare is the moniker for the Affordable Care Act.  Unfortunately, many people thought the last thing Obamacare would do was make health care more affordable.  Yet, early signs are pointing in...

Filed under: news

 
 
 

32 weeks ago

Obamacare: America's Greatest Legislation Since the Civil Rights Act?

Mar 4 2014, 1:37pm CST | by

Obamacare is the moniker for the Affordable Care Act.  Unfortunately, many people thought the last thing Obamacare would do was make health care more affordable.  Yet, early signs are pointing in the direction of a long-term change in America’s cost of providing health services or the better.

American health care is trending toward greater affordability

The November, 2013 White House report on “Trends in Health Care Cost Growth” provides a plethora of data supporting declining health care costs.  Growth in health care cost per capita at 1% in 2011 was the lowest since record keeping began in the 1960s.  Health care inflation now seems to be about the same as general inflation, after 5 decades of consistently outpacing other price increases.  And Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections of Medicare/Medicaid cost as a percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have declined substantially since 2010.

Of course, one could accuse the White House of being self-serving with this report.  But at a February National Association of Corporate Directors Chicago Conference on health care,

all agreed that, indeed, the world has changed as a result of Obamacare.  And one short-term outcome is American health care trending toward greater affordability.

How Obamacare promoted greater affordability is not at all obvious

Abdication: that is the word which best describes patient health care choices for the last several decades.  Patients simply did whatever they were told to do.  If a test was offered, or a procedure recommended, or a referral to a specialist given, or a drug prescribed patients simply did what they were told – “as long as the insurance paid.”

The process of health care implementation, how patients were treated, was specified by medical professionals in conjunction with insurance companies and Medicare.   Patients had little – or nothing – to do with the decision making process.  The service was either offered, and largely free, or it wasn’t offered.

In effect, American patients abdicated health care decision-making to others.

Decisions about what would be treated, when and how was almost wholly made without patient involvement.  And what would be charged, as well as who would pay, was also made by someone other than the patient.  The patient had no involvement in determining if there was any sort of cost/benefit analysis, or the comparing of different care options.

Insurance companies dickered with providers over pricing.  Then employers dickered with insurance companies over what would be covered in a plan, what the price would be and what percentage was paid by the insurance company and what would be paid by patients.  When a patient needed treatment either the employer’s insurance company paid, after a negotiation on price with the provider, or the insurance company did not.  And patients largely consumed whatever care was offered under their plan.

Or, if a patient was on Medicare the same process applied, just substitute for “employer” the words “a government agency.”

Americans abdicated the decision-making process for health care to a cumbersome process that involved medical professionals, insurance companies and employers.  Patients behaved like health care was free, even though everyone knew it was not free.  But the process of deciding what would be done, how it would be priced and measuring benefits had been abdicated by patients to this process years ago.

Obamacare moves Americans from a world of abdication to a world of accountability

Everyone now has to be insured, so the decision about what coverage each person has, at what level and cost, is now in the hands of the patient.  Rather than a single employer option, patients have a veritable smorgasboard of coverage options from which they can select.  And this begins the process of making each person accountable for their health care cost.

When people receive treatment, by and large more is now being paid by the patient.  And once people had to start paying, they had to be accountable for the cost (higher deductibles and co-pays had already started this process before Obamacare.)  When people became accountable for the cost, a lot more questions started to be asked about the price and the benefit.  Instead of consuming everything that was available, because there was no cost implication, patient accountability for some of the cost has now forced people to ask questions before committing to treatments.

Higher accountability now has consumers (patients) asking for more choices.  And more choices pushes providers to realize that price and delivery make a difference to the patient – who is now a decision-making buyer.

Health care demand and supply curves have changed dramatically/>/>

In economic lingo, accountability is changing the health care demand and supply curves.  Previously there was no elasticity of demand.  Patients had no incentives to reduce demand, as health care was perceived as free.  Providers had no incentive to alter supply, because the more they supplied the more they were paid.  Both supply and demand went straight up, because there was no pricing element to stand in the way of both increasing geometrically.

But now patients are making decisions using price, which alters demand. Increasingly they determine what procedures to have, based on price and expected outcomes. And suppliers are now evaluated based upon price, location, service history, provider experience, etc.  Patients can shop amongst hospitals and outpatient facilities to determine the cost of different procedures and decide which solution they prefer.  More services, at different locations and different price points creates a new supply curve, and impacts the demand curve.  We now have elasticity in both demand and supply.

A patient with a mild heart arythmia can decide if they really need an in-house EKG with a cardiologist review, or substitute an EKG detected from a smartphone device and diagnosed by an EKG tech remotely.  With both services offered at very different price points (and a host of options in the middle,) it is possible for the patient to change their demand for something like an EKG. And this impacts all the different aspects that are part of the total cost of cardiac care.  Patient/consumers may buy more of some care, such as services they find less costly or providers that are less pricey, and less of another service which is more costly due to the service, the provider or a combination of the two.

Thus accountability starts us down the road to greater affordability

In distribution terms, the old system was a “wholesale system” which had very expensive suppliers with pricing which was opaque – and often very bizarre.  Pricing was impossible to understand.  Middlemen in insurance companies hired by employers tried to determine what services should be given to patients, and at what prices for the employers (not the patient) to pay.  This wholesale distribution method of health care drove prices up.  Neither those creating demand (patients) or those offering the supply (medical providers) had any incentive to use less health care or lower the price.  And often it left both the patient and the supplier extremely unhappy with how they were treated by arbitrary middle-men more interested in groups than individuals.

The new approach is a retail system.  The patient no longer abdicates decision making to middle-men, and instead is accountable for the health care they receive and the price they pay. This retail approach to health care services consumption is creating a far more rational pricing system, and generating new curves that are starting to balance both demand and supply; while simultaneously encouraging the implementation of new options that provide the ability to enhance the service and/or outcome at lower price points.

Obamacare is just beginning its implementation.  “The devil is in the details,” and as we saw with the government web site for exchanges (Healthcare.Gov) there have been many, many glitches.  As with anything so encompassing and complex, there are lots of SNAFUs. The market is still far from transparent, and patients are far from educated, much less fully informed, decision-makers. There is a lot of confusion amongst providers, suppliers and patients.  Regulations are unclear, and not always handled consistently or judiciously.

But, America has made one heck of a start toward containing something which has overhung economic growth since the 1970s.  The health care cost trend is toward greater price visibility, smarter consumers, more options and lower health care costs both short- and long-term.

Obamacare is an economic game changer, similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1964

In the 1960s Congress, and the nation, was deeply divided over passing the Civil Rights Act.  Its impact would be significant on both the way of life for many people, and the economy.  How it would shape America was unclear, and many opposed its passage.  Called for by President Kennedy, President Johnson worked hard – and with lots of strong-arming – to obtain its passage after Kennedy’s death.

After a lot of haggling, some Congressional trickery, filibustering and a lot of legal challenges, the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964 and it ushered in a new wave of economic growth as it freed previously under-used intellectual resources to grow the American economy instead of being held back.  It was a game changer for the nation, and 40 years later, it’s hard to imagine an America without the gains made by the Civil Rights Act.

Looking 40 years forward, Obamacare – the ACA – may well be legislation that is seen as an economic game changer.  Although its passage was bruising to many in the nation, it changed health care from a system of patient abdication to one of patient accountability, and thereby directed health care toward greater affordability for the country and its citizens – after years of health care cost escalation which hindered economic growth.

Connect with me on LinkedIn, Facebook  and Twitter.

Links:

How the President was damaged by the botched Healthcare.gov implementation

Economically, could Obama be America’s best modern President?/>/>

Why Wall Street missed predicting Obama’s “miracle market” of 2013

America’s wrong-headed jobs and innovation policies

Could Democrats be better economic stewards than Republicans?

Source: Forbes Business

 
Update
2

7 weeks ago

Khazanah throws MAS RM6b lifeline

Aug 29 2014 5:01pm CDT | Source: Business Times Singapore

August 30, 2014 1:15 AMKHAZANAH Nasional will inject RM6 billion (SS$2.4 billion) over three years to resuscitate loss-making Malaysia Airlines (MAS) under a recovery plan that includes even an Act of Parliament. Other key moves are migrating its operations, assets and liabilities to a new ...
Source: Business Times Singapore   Full article at: Business Times Singapore
 

 
Update
1

7 weeks ago

MAS posts loss of RM307m for Q2

Aug 28 2014 5:00pm CDT | Source: Business Times Singapore

August 29, 2014 1:13 AMMALAYSIA Airlines (MAS) registered a loss of RM307 million (S$122 million) for the second quarter to end-June, but warned of worse to come in the second half when the "full financial impact of the double tragedi ...
Source: Business Times Singapore   Full article at: Business Times Singapore
 

 

Don't miss ...

 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/30" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Repeated viewing of violence and sex 'desensitises' parents
Washington, Oct 20 (IANS) In a stunning report, researchers have revealed that when it comes to sex and violence, the more parents watch TV shows or movies with explicit scenes, the less they care about what their kids can watch.
 
 
Nigeria declared free of Ebola
London, Oct 20 (IANS) The World Health Organisation (WHO) Monday officially declared Nigeria free of the Ebola virus disease after six weeks with no new cases.
 
 
New Zealand fault hole revealing secrets of earth's crust
Wellington, Oct 20 (IANS) An international team of scientists drilling a 1.3-km deep hole into the Alpine Fault in New Zealand's South Island say they are already gaining valuable insights into the earth's crust less than a quarter of the way down.
 
 
Young kids often given wrong medication
New York, Oct 20 (IANS) One child is affected every eight minutes when usually a well-meaning parent or caregiver commits an unintentional medication error, said a US-based study.
 
 
 

Latest from the Network

1,074 new dengue cases in Chinese province
Beijing, Oct 18 (IANS) China's Guangdong province has reported 1,047 new cases of dengue fever, health authorities said Saturday. Six people have already died in Guangdong -- five in Guangzhou and one in adjacent...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Blake Lively 'always' wanted to be mum
Blake Lively has ''always'' wanted to be a mother. The 27-year-old actress is expecting her first child with husband Ryan Reynolds and she admits she's been dreaming of this moment since she was a youngster. Speaking...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Kris Jenner 'torn apart' by Bruce's new relationship
Kris Jenner feels ''torn apart and angry'' that Bruce Jenner is dating her former assistant. The 58-year-old matriarch split from the 64-year-old Olympic gold medalist last October following 22-years of marriage but is...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Cheryl Fernandez-Versini won't move to France
Cheryl Fernandez-Versini doesn't want to move to her husband's home country of France. The 'X Factor' judge, 31, who comes from Newcastle, is adamant she won't be relocating any time soon to suit her new spouse Jean-...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Lance Bass sets wedding date
Lance Bass has set a date for his wedding. The former *NSYNC singer and his partner Michael Turchin, who have been dating for two-and-a-half years, are to tie the knot on December 20, 2014, a representative for the...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Nepal avalanche toll reaches 39
Kathmandu, Oct 18 (IANS) At least 39 climbers died while hiking on a key Nepali route after it was hit by a major snowstorm and avalanches earlier this week, BBC reported Saturday citing officials. Over 350 stranded...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Jake Gyllenhaal says society is complicit in 'nightcrawling'
Jake Gyllenhaal says almost everybody in society ought to relate to his new movie 'Nightcrawlers'. The eagerly-awaited film concerns those people who monitor police scanners and then race to crime scenes to film eye-...
Read more on Movie Balla
 
India eves look for first win in AFC U-16 qualifiers
Dhaka, Oct 18 (IANS) India will hope to register their first win of the 2015 Asian Football Confederation (AFC) Under-16 Women's Championship qualifiers when they take on hosts Bangladesh in a crucial encounter at the...
Read more on Sport Balla
 
Moyes mulling return to management
London, Oct 18 (IANS) Former Manchester United manager David Moyes said that he is ready to revive his managerial career six months after being sacked by the 'Red Devils'. "I am ready to return. I have enjoyed the...
Read more on Sport Balla
 
Ebola fears loom over Ghana hosting AFCON
Accra (Ghana), Oct 18 (IANS) The Ghana Medical Association (GMA) cautioned the government Saturday against hosting the 2015 African Cup of Nations (AFCON), despite a request by the Confederation of African Football (...
Read more on Sport Balla