360° Coverage : Japan's New Conversation on Its Constitution

2 Updates

Japan's New Conversation on Its Constitution

May 16 2014, 6:27pm CDT | by

On Thursday, the Advisory Panel on Reconstruction of the Legal Basis for Security presented Prime Minister Shinzo Abe with its long anticipated report advocating for loosening the restraints on the...

Filed under: news

 
 
 

22 weeks ago

Japan's New Conversation on Its Constitution

May 16 2014, 6:27pm CDT | by

On Thursday, the Advisory Panel on Reconstruction of the Legal Basis for Security presented Prime Minister Shinzo Abe with its long anticipated report advocating for loosening the restraints on the use of force by the Japanese military. The panel advocates a reinterpretation of the Constitution to allow the SDF to use force on behalf of other nations.

This call for an expansive review of existing policy on how the Self-Defense Force (SDF) currently operates, however, is not government policy. In his statement yesterday, Abe outlined a narrower ambition. Over the remainder of this year and into the next, we should expect to see an important debate in Japan over how to honor the spirit of the postwar Constitution while revisiting this question of when and how the Japanese military can use force.

Limiting the scope for Japan’s military to use force is deeply embedded in the postwar debate over Article 9, the famous “anti-war” clause. Article 9 explicitly renounces the “use of force as a means of settling international disputes.” But successive Japanese governments have interpreted Article 9 to allow for the right of self-defense, an inherent right of all nations according to the United Nations Charter.

Throughout the postwar era, government defense policy choices such as what weapons to buy, what missions were acceptable, and what cooperation was allowed with the United States were subject to parliamentary review, and an indispensable part of that review included a legal examination of whether policy complied with the Constitution. Over time, as technology evolved and the SDF grew into a more professional organization, Japan’s defense policy debate also adapted, and the kinds of issues that triggered concern over compliance with the Constitution also changed.

Today, the focal point of the Abe cabinet policy review is what is called the “right of collective self-defense,” a term created by Japanese legal scholars and policy practitioners in the early decades of the postwar era. Simply put, the Japanese cabinet and parliament have interpreted Article 9 to prevent the SDF from firing their weapons on behalf of others. This has affected the ability of the SDF to operate with the U.S. military in the alliance, and has limited the scope of SDF participation in UN Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) as well as the coalition effort in Iraq.

For many, this new effort to reinterpret Japan’s Constitution signals a sharp departure. Much of the criticism focuses on Abe himself, and his well-known desire to revise the Constitution. Critics see this debate on collective self-defense as simply a backhanded way of moving Japan further from its postwar commitment to renounce war. The New York Times went so far as to characterize this effort to reinterpret Article 9 as “an act [that] would undermine the democratic process,” a criticism that Japan’s ambassador to the United States, Kenichiro Sasae, roundly rejects.

To be sure, this debate over allowing Japan’s military to work closely with U.S. forces, and to participate more fully in UN PKO, will focus on one of the core tenets of self-restraint adopted by two generations of Japanese political leaders. Moreover, this debate in Japan comes at a time of significant regional tensions, and when anxiety within Japan over its ability to contend with a more lethally armed Pyongyang and a more challenging Beijing is running high.

Yet it is important to understand what is being undertaken, and to recognize the process by which Japanese consensus will be generated. The NYT editorial suggested that this is being done by the “whim of government,” but in fact there will be a full examination of the policies being considered. The legitimacy of the Abe cabinet’s choices will be scrutinized both at home and abroad, and a full and open process of legislative deliberation lies ahead.

Yesterday, Abe outlined his decision on how to proceed. The advisory report called for a wholesale review of the limitations on the SDF and its use of force, and argued for abandoning the premise that the SDF should only use the minimal necessary amount of force in its effort to defend Japan. Furthermore, the report argued the need for the SDF to be able to use its weapons when operating with others, such as the actual missions it faces in UN PKO and when operating with the United States to evacuate or transport Japanese nationals from a contingency.

But Prime Minister Abe in his remarks yesterday suggested a more circumscribed policy review than many expected. He outlined his government’s priorities going forward as follows: first, create a “seamless legal system” that will allow the SDF to cooperate with other forces; second, examine necessary legislation under the current interpretation of the Constitution related to two SDF requirements: strengthening responses to “grey zone” situations short of conflict and contributing to international cooperation on logistics and PKO; and, finally, examine specific situations where the right of collective self-defense might be permissible if an armed attack is conducted against other nations in a way that significantly affects the security of Japan.

What happens next will be a process of deliberation within the government, as well as within the Diet. Already, the LDP has had significant input from its coalition partner, the New Komeito, and many speculate that the prime minister’s more limited vision is a result of their influence. Electorally, the LDP and the New Komeito have a symbiotic relationship, and Abe would be hard pressed to move in a direction that the more cautious Komeito will not support, especially before next year’s local elections.

A full deliberation within the cabinet will be forthcoming, and in preparation for a cabinet decision, the Cabinet Legislation Bureau will be asked to review the government’s intended policy to identify areas of conflict with Japan’s Constitution. Here it is important to note that this oversight is required prior to drafting legislation for parliamentary deliberation. Leadership of the Cabinet Legislation Bureau has just changed, and this may introduce an added element of uncertainty into the process.

Once the cabinet decision is made (most expect this to happen before the end of the current Diet session in mid-June), legislation can be drafted, and any related laws amended. Should the right of collective self-defense be reinterpreted, ten to fourteen laws may need to be revised, and a package of bills will be presented to the Diet for the extraordinary session this fall or, if this process takes more time, the regular Diet session next spring.

This morning, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said in his press conference that the Abe cabinet would welcome discussion in the Diet even before the government concludes its deliberations. Discussions in advance of a cabinet decision are rare in Japan, and if any of the opposition parties take Suga up on this they would most likely happen in the Budget Committee or through a deliberative process among heads of parties.

It is too early to tell just how far the Abe cabinet will move on reinterpreting the right of collective self-defense. More important than the speculation over Abe’s motives, however, will be the way in which Japan’s parliament addresses the question of whether the time has come for the SDF to be allowed to work alongside U.S. and other militaries in collective military action.

The United States and Japan have initiated a defense review of their guidelines for military cooperation, largely in an effort to consider how and when the two militaries will cope with new regional scenarios, including dealing with a Senkaku Islands contingency. Japan’s conversation on its military and the parameters under which it can use force, therefore, will affect that alliance discussion.

For the next year, we will also have a chance to see how the Japanese people respond to this question of reinterpretation of the Constitution. If Japan’s SDF uses force, it will need to do so with the full support of its public. Likewise, if the Japanese public expects the SDF to defend their nation, they will need to give them the latitude to do so effectively./>/>

Almost seventy years after Japan’s defeat in 1945, Japanese society continues to balance carefully the role of the military in the exercise of national policy. The exercise of civilian control has been deeply entrenched in postwar Japanese policymaking, but the question of what the SDF might need to do to defend Japan has not been as deeply considered. Today, Japan’s military is being placed increasingly in situations where the use of force may be necessary. Mostly, these scenarios have been under the auspices of the UN.

But there are some troubling signs in Northeast Asia, where the basic mission of defending Japan comes into play. What limits should be placed on the SDF? What missions are they expected to undertake, and can they do so under the limits Japanese leaders imposed on themselves over half a century ago? This is the policy question under debate in Japan. It is not a question of whether Japanese democratic institutions are working. Rather it is a debate about allowing Japan’s postwar military to fulfill the missions it has been assigned alongside its alliance partner and other national militaries under UN command.

Over the next year, the Japanese people will need to consider carefully these questions, questions that were asked by their grandparents perhaps some fifty years earlier. Before we jump to condemn the discussion, we might want to take a closer look at what is being discussed and how the conversation already underway in Japan is evolving.

This article originally appeared on the Council on Foreign Relations’ Asia Unbound blog, which can be found here.

 
Update
2

7 weeks ago

Khazanah throws MAS RM6b lifeline

Aug 29 2014 5:01pm CDT | Source: Business Times Singapore

August 30, 2014 1:15 AMKHAZANAH Nasional will inject RM6 billion (SS$2.4 billion) over three years to resuscitate loss-making Malaysia Airlines (MAS) under a recovery plan that includes even an Act of Parliament. Other key moves are migrating its operations, assets and liabilities to a n ...
Source: Business Times Singapore   Full article at: Business Times Singapore
 

 
Update
1

7 weeks ago

MAS posts loss of RM307m for Q2

Aug 28 2014 5:00pm CDT | Source: Business Times Singapore

August 29, 2014 1:13 AMMALAYSIA Airlines (MAS) registered a loss of RM307 million (S$122 million) for the second quarter to end-June, but warned of worse to come in the second half when the "full financial impact of the double tragedies ...
Source: Business Times Singapore   Full article at: Business Times Singapore
 

 

Don't miss ...

 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/30" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Drug-resistant bacteria to be soon taken care of
London, Oct 19 (IANS) In a major breakthrough, researchers have discovered how bacteria destroy antibiotics - a finding that will help develop drugs which can effectively tackle infections in the future.
 
 
Brain myths hampering teaching worldwide
London, Oct 19 (IANS) Myths about the brain are common among teachers worldwide and are hampering teaching, noted a study that called for better communication between neuroscientists and educators.
 
 
How a rare pathogen could infect the healthiest of people
Washington, Oct 19 (IANS) A unique evolutionary trait in a rare pathogen called Cryptococcus gattii allows it to infect even the healthiest of hosts through a mechanism that neutralises the body's immune response against it, a study showed.
 
 
Implantable eye devices that improve vision
Washington, Oct 19 (IANS) Scientists have developed implantable eye devices that improve vision and could soon become a viable alternative for ageing eyes.
 
 
 

Latest from the Network

Bush shoe-tossing painting hits record at Doha auction
Doha, Oct 15 (IANS/EFE) A controversial painting by Iranian artist Mahmud Obaidi, depicting an Iraqi journalist throwing shoe in 2008 at then US president George W. Bush, was sold for $62,500 at a Sotheby's auction in...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
US offers $45 mn bounty for eight terror leaders
Washington, Oct 15 (IANS) The US said Tuesday it is offering rewards totalling up to 45 million dollars for information on eight key leaders of the Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) terrorist organisation. The...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
UNSC extends peacekeeping mission's term in Abyei
United Nations, Oct 15 (IANS) The UN Security Council (UNSC) has renewed the mandate of the UN peacekeeping mission in the Abyei border region between Sudan and South Sudan. In an unanimously adopted resolution, the...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Ebola cases in West Africa could reach 10,000 per week: WHO
Geneva, Oct 15 (IANS) The World Health Organisation (WHO) has warned that the Ebola epidemic in West Africa could reach 5,000 to 10,000 cases per week by the first week of December. "Quite frankly, ladies and...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Turkey, Singapore sign strategic partnership agreement
Ankara, Oct 15 (IANS) Turkey and Singapore have signed a strategic partnership agreement to boost economic, political and cultural cooperation, as well as security collaboration, during the official visit of...
Read more on Politics Balla
 
Christina Aguilera is returning to 'The Voice' USA
Christina Aguilera will return to 'The Voice' USA next year. The 'Your Body' hitmaker, who previously shared a rotating spot on the judging panel with Shakira, has been replaced by Gwen Stefani this season as she is...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Kesha's music producer hits back
Kesha is being countersued by her record company boss, Dr. Luke. The 41-year-old music producer, who runs Kemosabe Records, claims the 27-year-old 'Tik Tok' singer is a liar and is trying to extort him after she accused...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Jason Derulo won't get back together with Jordin Sparks
Jason Derulo insists his split from Jordin Sparks is permanent. The 'Talk Dirty' hitmaker, who recently ended his relationship with the 'No Air' singer after three years of dating, has ruled out getting back together...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Josh Groban feels 'very lucky' to be dating Kat Dennings
Josh Groban feels ''very lucky'' to be dating Kat Dennings. The 'Brave' hitmaker was very nervous before singing in front of the '2 Broke Girls' actress for the first time at the Carousel of Hope Ball in Beverly Hills,...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Australian Richard Flanagan wins 2014 Man Booker prize
London, Oct 15 (IANS) The first Man Booker prize to allow American nominees was Tuesday night won by an Australian, with Richard Flanagan triumphing for a novel of love and war that tells the harrowing stories of...
Read more on Celebrity Balla